About AISI Media Center AISI Events Learning Center Shop AISI
  Advanced Search
Steel Markets
Automotive
      -- Enabling Technologies
      -- Technical Information
      -- Tailored Steel Prod...
      -- Automotive Safety
      -- Steel Wheels
      -- Steel Bumpers
      -- Steel Fuel Tanks
      -- Long Products
      -- Auto/Steel Partnership
      -- ----------------------
      -- Auto Press Releases
      -- Auto Articles
      -- AutoVision

Construction
Cans & Containers
Other Markets
Steel Industry
Statistics
Public Policy
Manufacturing
Environment
Consumer Resources
Steel In your Life
Steel Recycling
Steel Q&A
Members Only


Bar Steel Fatigue Blog

Comparison of the Case and Core Properties of Induction Hardened Steels

Medium and high carbon bar steels are often used in the induction hardened condition for applications such as axles and shafts. Induction hardening is a surface hardening heat treatment whereby a component is rapidly heated for a short period of time in an induction coil and then quenched. This results in a high-hardness, wear resistant case and a softer core. Of interest are the comparative fatigue properties of the hardened case versus the softer core.  AISI obtained axle shafts that had been hot forged, cold extruded and induction hardened. The steel grade was SAE 1050.

The mechanical properties and hardness obtained for the case and core were as follows:
 
Location   Yield Str., MPa  Tensile Str., MPa  Red. in Area, %   BHN
 
Core            460              828.5                      34.1             220
 
Case         2100             2360                        14.7             536
 
The core exhibited a ferrite-pearlite microstructure, and the high hardness case was 100% martensite. The differences in the mechanical properties and hardness of the case and core are (as might be expected) quite significant.
 
The strain-controlled fatigue properties determined for both the case and the core are shown in Figure 1.
 

Figure 1 (click here for larger image).

The strain-life curve for Iteration No. 4 shows the fatigue behavior of the core; the  strain-life curve for Iteration No. 5 shows the behavior for the high-hardness case. In the short life regime (at high strain amplitudes), the softer core exhibits better fatigue properties than the case.  In the long life regime where strain amplitudes are lower, the case shows superior fatigue properties to the core. A cross-over point can be seen at approximately 104 reversals. 
 
High hardness is generally considered to result in better fatigue properties at long life, and this is confirmed in Figure 1. This data also shows however that at high strain amplitudes a high hardness exhibits a greater tendency toward crack initiation. This suggests that the case of induction hardened shafts may be vulnerable to crack formation under conditions where "spike" loading occurs.

Comments
This site is running a Congruent Media enhanced version of BlogCFC 5.9.002. Contact Blog Owner



About   |   Search  |  Site Map  |  Contact  |  Shop  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright 2008, American Iron and Steel Institute