About AISI Media Center AISI Events Learning Center Shop AISI
  Advanced Search
Steel Markets
Automotive
      -- Enabling Technologies
      -- Technical Information
      -- Tailored Steel Prod...
      -- Automotive Safety
      -- Steel Wheels
      -- Steel Bumpers
      -- Steel Fuel Tanks
      -- Long Products
      -- Auto/Steel Partnership
      -- ----------------------
      -- Auto Press Releases
      -- Auto Articles
      -- AutoVision

Construction
Cans & Containers
Other Markets
Steel Industry
Statistics
Public Policy
Manufacturing
Environment
Consumer Resources
Steel In your Life
Steel Recycling
Steel Q&A
Members Only


Bar Steel Fatigue Blog

Comparison of the Case and Core Properties of Carburized Steels

In recent postings, the strain-controlled fatigue properties of the high-hardness case and low-hardness core of induction hardened steels were compared. It was shown that at short lives, the softer core outperformed the high-hardness case. At long life, the fatigue properties of the high-hardness case were found to be superior.  

Case hardening by carburizing presents an opportunity for a similar comparison. This process results in a component with superior wear resistance along with excellent mechanical properties and toughness.  During carburizing, a component is heat treated in a carbon-bearing atmosphere to permit diffusion of carbon into the surface of the part. A high-carbon case is developed, the depth of which is a function of time and temperature during heat treatment. At the end of the process, the component is quenched and tempered resulting in a very high hardness case and a lower hardness core. 
 
AISI has examined the fatigue properties of both the case and core for a number of steel grades used in carburizing applications. In this posting, the properties of SAE 4620 are presented. The properties of the case were developed through simulation by diffusing carbon completely through fatigue specimen blanks. The properties of the core were simulated by subjecting specimens to the carburizing thermal cycle absent the presence of carbon in the atmosphere.
 
The following chart shows the mechanical properties and hardness obtained for the case and core:
 
Location   Yield Str.  Tensile Str.   Red. in Area    HRC
                      MPa          MPa                  %_________
 
Core         891.5         963.7               61.9             29.6
 
Case       1169.1       1775.6                 1.4              54
 
The case microstructure was 100% martensite, and a mixed bainite-martensite microstructure was developed in the core. The differences in the mechanical properties and hardness between case and core are quite evident.
 
Figure 1 (below) shows the strain controlled fatigue properties for both the case and the core.
 
 
  
 
The strain-life curve for Iteration No. 53 shows the fatigue behavior of the core, and the strain-life curve for Iteration No. 54 shows the behavior for the high-hardness case. As was shown for induction hardened steels, in the short life regime, at high strain amplitudes the softer core exhibits better fatigue properties than the case.  In the long life regime, where strain amplitudes are lower, the case shows superior fatigue properties to the core. A cross-over point can be seen between 103 and 104 reversals. 
 
The data show that as expected, high hardness such as that shown in the case, results in better long life fatigue properties. At short life however, the data suggests that the high hardness case may be more prone to crack initiation where occasional overloads are encountered.

 

Comments (Comment Moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until approved.)
This site is running a Congruent Media enhanced version of BlogCFC 5.9.002. Contact Blog Owner



About   |   Search  |  Site Map  |  Contact  |  Shop  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright 2008, American Iron and Steel Institute