http://www.autosteel.org/en/Programs/Long%20Products/LongProductsTechnicalDocumentsFeed.aspxAISI Feeden{38EA1559-94B6-4297-9B63-ED2685513111}http://www.autosteel.org/en/sitecore/content/Autosteel_org/Document%20Types/Technical%20Documents/2011/Long%20Products%20-%20Bar%20Steel%20Fatigue%20Database.aspxThis database provides engineers with accurate and detailed component fatigue life predictions that allows them to optimize critical powertrain and chassis component designs.Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:26:06 -0500{E9D10252-E42B-4434-A736-BFB447ACDF48}http://www.autosteel.org/en/sitecore/content/Autosteel_org/Document%20Types/Technical%20Documents/2007/Stress%20Analysis%20and%20Optimization%20of%20Crankshafts%20Subject%20to%20Dynamic%20Loading.aspxThis study investigated weight and cost reduction opportunities for a forged steel crankshaft.Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:27:05 -0400{CB24D24D-CB21-43D5-9B3E-6C29B1A2B8C6}http://www.autosteel.org/en/sitecore/content/Autosteel_org/Document%20Types/Technical%20Documents/2006%20and%20Before/Fatigue%20Performance%20Evaluation%20of%20Forged%20Versus%20Competing%20Manufacturing%20Process%20Technologies.aspxThis study by the University of Toledo examines manufacturing technologies in order to compare fatigue performance and to develop methodology for durability assessment and efficient optimization.Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:25:37 -0400{E745FA34-4F60-4A69-A24B-811D859916AE}http://www.autosteel.org/en/sitecore/content/Autosteel_org/Document%20Types/Technical%20Documents/2007/Fatigue%20Performance%20Evaluation%20of%20Forged%20Steel%20vs%20Ductile%20Cast%20Iron%20Crankshaft%20-%20Executive%20Summary.aspxThe University of Toledo Executive Summary outlines its test results of the fatigue performance of forged steel vs. ductile cast iron crankshafts. Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:24:51 -0400{03C1529C-A836-4834-88C8-B4BDA7C60063}http://www.autosteel.org/en/sitecore/content/Autosteel_org/Document%20Types/Technical%20Documents/2007/Fatigue%20Performance%20Comparison%20and%20Life%20Predictions%20of%20Forged%20Steel.aspxThis study evaluated and compared the fatigue performance of two competing manufacturing technologies for automotive crankshafts. Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:23:49 -0400{CA3030D8-45DF-4B23-9C80-C73091474D77}http://www.autosteel.org/en/sitecore/content/Autosteel_org/Document%20Types/Technical%20Documents/2006%20and%20Before/Dynamic%20Load%20Analysis%20and%20Optimization%20of%20Connecting%20Rods.aspxAn AISI sponsored study confirming the benefits of using C-70 steel that can reduce the cost for making forged connecting rods by 25 percent, and can reduce mass about 10 percent, while enhancing performance and durability.Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:22:54 -0400{B9F5CE5F-AF3C-44F6-BEB7-CE01EAF0F74F}http://www.autosteel.org/en/sitecore/content/Autosteel_org/Document%20Types/Technical%20Documents/2006%20and%20Before/Development%20of%20a%20Standard%20Methodology%20for%20the%20Quantitative%20Measurement.aspxA technical paper on standard practices for obtaining and archiving quantitative steel transformation kinetic data and thermal strain data that will greatly assist endusers in developing accurate process and product simulations during the thermo-mechanical processing of bar and rod product steels.Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:22:09 -0400{A9346CAA-5E7F-451A-A61F-5E0972773211}http://www.autosteel.org/en/sitecore/content/Autosteel_org/Document%20Types/Technical%20Documents/2008/Bar%20Steel%20Machinability%20Estimator.aspxA tool for automotive engineers to generate calculations on the machining productivity of various carbon and alloy steels in carbide tooling applications.Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:21:21 -0400